Details on NIS+ installation Frequently asked Questions/Answers on Solaris 2.x, in the area of networks Q) What is NIS+? A) Network Information Service (NIS+) is an enterprise level naming service designed to serve small to very large networks. It is a replacement for earlier NIS (nee YP) and a complete rewrite. In NIS compatibility mode, NIS+ serves NIS client requests as well. Q) What are the key differences between NIS and NIS+? A) There are many differences, but here are the main four - NIS had a flat name space, while NIS+ is hierarchical. So with NIS+ one can easily manage growth and changes. - NIS+ is secure and allows fine grain access control. - NIS+ updates are on incremental basis and much faster (in minutes). - NIS tables were single key-value pairs while NIS+ has multiple key value pairs. This means that you can do searches based upon a particular value of a particular key. Q) How will I benefit from NIS+? A) Now, one no longer has to wait for 24 hours or more to get the maps propagated. NIS+ does fast incremental updates. So, it should be very fast and easy to update any of these changes You will be able to traverse through all the domains without much trouble. Earlier there was no easy way to find out information about other domains. You will get improved fault tolerance even if some of the NIS+ server die. Your client will attempt to bind to any of the NIS+ servers even if they are not the same subnet. Your local sysadmin can set policies such that you can change some of the fields of your entries. For example, you could change your shell or home directory without going through a sysadmin. Q) Can I still use all YP/NIS commands? A) This will depend upon whether there is a NIS server available for your domain OR whether the NIS+ server is running in YP compat mode. If it is, then one should be able to make use of all YP commands except those commands that change the NIS maps such as yppasswd or chkey for publickey information. Even if your NIS and NIS+ domainnames are not the same, one can run ypset and bind it to a different domain than its own local domain. You will also notice some differences in terms of the names of the automounter maps. These maps no longer have any embedded dots '.' in them. Also, some of the maps may now look different, for example, the hosts map. If some of your applications use NIS API and refer to maps with embedded dots in them, then they will not be able to find those maps. We recommend that you use NIS+ commands for your queries. Q) Can I revert back to using NIS? A) That depends upon the way things were set up. If there is still a NIS server on your subnet, it can still be done. The main change required will be - change your domainname back to what it was - change your /etc/nsswitch.conf to your earlier set up Q) Can I still send/receive mail outside my domain? Is my NIS+ domain same as my mail domain? A) Yes, you should be able to send/receive mail as earlier. For mail purposes, you are still a part of the domain above you. For example, if you are currently in XYZ.Eng.Sun.COM, for mail purposes, you are in Eng.Sun.COM domain. Your email address may change depending upon the new NIS+ domainnames. Q) Can I do lookups in other domains? A) Yes, you just need to specify the complete NIS+ name of the table/entity that you are trying to locate. Q) Can I log in on machines in other domains? A) Only if your local credentials have been added to that other domain. Q) I am running 4.X. Can I run NIS+ on my machine? A) No, not as a client. We only support 4.X NIS+ servers. There is no support for any of the name service switch and the associated getxxbyyy routines in libc. However, from a NIS+ 4.X server, one can execute all NIS+ commands. Q) Will conversion to NIS+ give me performance problems? A) In normal operations, you should not see any impact. A few things have speeded up substantially, for example, doing su with NIS+ has become very fast. One may find that the number of packets that go to the network have increased in number. We hope to address that in 493 release. Q) What are the known major problems with NIS+? A) NIS+ servers (when running in NIS compatibility mode) can serve NIS requests from 4.X clients but it cannot forward 4.X DNS requests to the nameserver. This means that one cannot talk to other DNS domains. This is not a problem with Solaris 2.0 clients which use the name service switch to get the appropriate access. The installation isnt exactly fool-proof. We hope to address this in a future release. Q) What is involved in setting up NIS+ on my desktop? A) You should be running Solaris 2.0 or higher to be able to run NIS+. The following should be done: - change your domainname to the new NIS+ domainname - create /var/nis directory - add the IP address for your NIS+ server in your /etc/hosts file - change your /etc/nsswitch.conf file to use NIS+ instead of NIS - adding /etc/resolv.conf file along with nameserver entries - make changes to your /etc/auto files to refer to automounter maps in auto_form from auto.form. - adding NIS+ credentials in the cred table for yourself as well as for your machine. Q) Why do I have to have all these passwds? NIS did not require one. A) NIS+ is secure. i.e. the NIS+ server before giving you any information verifies that you indeed have the rights to get access to that information. This security is based upon secure RPC, which needs you to have publickey and secretkey stored with NIS+; and your secretkey is encrypted with your passwd. Hence you need this extra passwd during chkey time. If this passwd is not the same as your login passwd, then you will not be able to make NIS+ calls unless you have done an explicit keylogin(1). NIS was not based upon secure RPC. So, there was no need for a passwd there. You still needed a passwd for logging in, just as in the old time-sharing days. Q) Can I have different passwd for NIS+ and logging in? Are there any impact if I have my own entry in my local /etc/passwd file? A) yes, you can; but this would mean that you will have to do a keylogin(1) before you can make any NIS+ operations. So, we recommend that this not be the case. It is perfectly reasonable to have your passwd entry also in the /etc/passwd file; just make sure that it is the same as in passwd table. The only problem is when you change your keys. During the installation time, you would normally do a chkey, and chkey being a user level program cannot read your /etc/shadow file. So, as a workaround, set your passwd entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf to nisplus and files, do the chkey and then put it back the original way. You will also have to change your passwds at two places, once in your local passwd file and then in the NIS+ passwd table with passwd(1) and nispasswd(1), respectively. Q) My machine name collides with someone's login name. What do I do? Why should I care? It worked earlier, now it does not, why? A) Clients of NIS+ (called as NIS+ principals) can be both machines as well as normal users. The NIS+ principals are named as use_login.domainname or machinename.domainname. For example, my NIS+ principal name is name.eng.sun.com. My machine's NIS+ principal name is machine.eng.sun.com. NIS+ does not distinguish between the two - both of them have their own associated credentials and NIS+ access control mechanism uses it to allow/deny permission to access information. So, the machines and users now share the same name space. In the past, this was not a problem because anyone could be a client of NIS and access NIS information. Approximately 10% of users may find this collision. In such cases, preference is being given to the user. i.e. the user gets to keep the same name and the machine's name has to be changed. We suggest that you choose a new name for your machine and add an alias for your machine's old name. Q) Is it still possible to play around in a NIS+ domain and yet use NIS domain (different from NIS+ domain) for daily operations? A) It is possible but the steps are slightly complicated. The problem comes from the fact that the domain names are different and that all entries in /etc/nsswitch.conf assume that they are all to be resolved to the current domainname. Here is the hack: # domainname newNIS+domain # edit /etc/nsswitch.conf file to have only files for publickey. Comment out the entry for "nobody" in your /etc/publickey file. # Kill ypbind # Add the IP address of the NIS+ server in /etc/hosts file # nisinit -c -H server_name # nis_cachemgr # test it by doing nisls or any other NIS+ operation on the NIS+ domainname # domainname old_domain_name # restart your ypbind With this hack, you are now accessing NIS+ tables as "nobody" and you will have to specify the complete directory name for any operation. Also, now you cannot make any secure RPC call. Q) I recently installed a 486/50 machine as an NIS client in house. and connected to our local network via a THICK net ethernet drop. I now have that machine up at a vendor site who has THIN ethernet and is not running NIS+ nor NIS, so I specified NONE during the configuration. This is a class B address i.e. 130.35.19.70 and the subnet mask is ffff0000 . However, I am not able to a) talk to any other machines b) OPENWINHOME hangs consistently. A) If you are using THIN net then make sure you reconfigure the smc card for THIN net, the default is usually THICK net. If you are not getting any error messages from the smc driver during boot up then the IRQ and I/O address should be correct. However, there might be a conflict of the shared memory address and usually this is with the disk controller. Q) I'm trying to use NIS+ on a PC running Solaris 86. I have an SS2 set up is the NIS+ master server. NISD is running with a security level of 0. I've followed the directions in answerbook for setting up and NIS+ client. I've created an account called markl on sparc2 ( the nis server ). I've put the home directory in /home2/markl, and am using the automounter to give me a home path of /home/markl. I can log onto sparc2 without problems. When I try to login as markl on solaris86 ( the intel box ), I'm told that I don't have a password and I should make one. It runs the passwd command ( you can see the word passwd on the screen ) and then there is not markl account. Then back to login. When I login to root, and do a csh, I can su markl, I can cd ~markl, I can niscat passwd.orig_dir and see the passwd data. It has an entry for markl. If I su to junk, I'm told the junk is not a valid account. It seems that the NIS bindings are working, just not login. Also, I can go to a system running SunOs 4.1.2 as an NIS client ( not NIS+ ) and login as markl. Has anyone tested the NIS+ client with a Sparc based NIS+ master server. Anyone have any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?? A) The following is the workaround for this problem: Apparently this problem is caused by the passwd file is used to populate the passwd table by using the nisaddent "passwd" command, it assumes that the file is a 5.X passwd file and hence does not populate the "shadow" column of the passwd table. The sysadmin is then supposed to run the nisaddent command with the equivalent shadow file. e.g. # cat /etc/passwd | nisaddent -v passwd # cat /etc/shadow | nisaddent -v shadow However, in this particular case, there was no equivalent shadow file available and hence the passwd col was empty and hence no one could login to these machines. Workaround #1: The work around is as follows: e.g. The /etc/passwd need to contain the encrypted password. # cat /etc/passwd | nisaddent -v passwd # awk -F: '{printf("%s:%s:6445::::::\n", $1, $2)}' /etc/passwd > /tmp/shadow # cat /tmp/shadow | nisaddent -v shadow Workaround #2: The other way to solve this problem is to use the -y option of nisaddent. This only works if the customer has a running YP domain setup. First ypxfr the passwd map to the machine and then use nisadent -y # /usr/lib/netsvc/yp/ypxfr -c -d YP_DOMAINNAME -h YP_SERVER passwd.byname # /usr/lib/nis/nisaddent -y YP_DOMAINNAME passwd With this way, there is no need to run any awk script and everything works fine. Q) The NIS+ server was unavailable and the clients were not allowing logins. What needs to be done? A) Change the following two lines in the nsswitch.conf file passwd: files nisplus group: files nisplus to passwd: files [NOTFOUND=return] nisplus group: files [NOTFOUND=return] nisplus You should be able to login now. Q) What is the significance of having the default entry as networks: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files in /etc/nsswitch.conf ? A) The reason that the default nsswitch.conf file contains "[NOTFOUND=return]" is that we wanted the default behaviour to be 4.x-compatible, and 4.x generally follows a policy of "only look at 'files' if 'nis' is unavailable". Thus entries like networks: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files do the right thing for 4.x-compatibility _____________________________________________________________ Installation of admintool and host manager Frequently asked Questions/Answers on Solaris 2.x, in the area of networks Q) What does the choice of name service in Host Manager and User Account Manager mean? A) The choice of NIS+, NIS, or None is typically per-network. Usually you should specify it the same way every time you start Host Manager or User Account Manager on a network. Do not change name services per-host or per-user. If you need to edit a particular record in a particular database stored by a particular name service, you can use the lower level tool Database Manager. Q) If name service should always be the same, why do Host Manager and User Account Manager present a choice? A) Firstly, admintool can't always figure out what the right answer is and so is asking you for verification. And secondly, sysadmins with unusual configurations sometimes need to override the choice of name service. Q) Can I select a different name service for each host when adding clients through Host Manager? A) The simplest answer is "No". All centrally administered Solaris hosts on a network should use the same name service(s). Even though Solaris provides another name service (NIS+), a new set of administration tools (admintool), and the ability to control the order of name service lookups by database (/etc/nsswitch.conf), it still expects all centrally administered hosts on the network to use the same name service(s). Unfortunately the appearance of the admintool tools has misled some users to conclude that use of different name service(s) by different Solaris hosts was intended to be fully automatic and transparent. Q) Are there exceptions to the rule that all Solaris hosts on a network should use the same name service(s)? A) Yes. Some support is provided to ease transition from NIS to NIS+, or from None to NIS+. Knowledgeable users can use the None option to set up some test configurations. And power users may wish to modify the /etc/nsswitch.conf file on their workstation. Q) Does saying that all Solaris hosts should use the same name service(s) mean they should use only one name service? A) No. Hosts normally use a combination of local and network name services to allow both independent bootup and easy normal operation, and to provide local overrides to network- wide information. For example the template /etc/nsswitch.nisplus allows local entries for passwd, group, automount, and aliases to override network-wide information. Q) /etc/nsswitch.conf appears to provide a great deal of flexibility, some of which isn't used. What's the file for? A) The initial motivation for /etc/nsswitch.conf was to give users full control over where and in what order gethostbyname() looked, similar to Ultrix. The implementation scheme used was so simple and powerful that its use was extended to cover most name service lookups rather than just gethostbyname() calls. This increased flexibility is available to all users. As distributed, Solaris uses one of only three standard configurations of /etc/nsswitch.conf (templates nsswitch.nisplus, nsswitch.nis, and nsswitch.files), depending on whether the network name service is NIS+, NIS, or None. A simple change to activate DNS for gethostbyname() calls is included in the comments inside /etc/nsswitch.nisplus. Q) Why is the None name service option provided? A) The primary reason for the None name service option is to support customers who won't run either NIS or NIS+. Most such customers keep a master copy of /etc configuration files on a central machine and use `rdist` or a similar tool to broadcast copies to all workstations. The second reason for the None name service option is to support local overrides to network-wide information. The third reason for the None name service option is to help work around the lack of programmatic updates to NIS. Finally, the None name service option supports quick setup of demo or test configurations by knowledgeable users who either can't or don't want to update the name service. Q) If I explicitly specify a different name service when adding a client, will Host Manager "make it right"? For example, if my network is running NIS+, yet before adding a new dataless client I specify None, will Host Manager update all the right files in the right way to make the new client known all across the NIS+ domain? A) No. There is no combination of file and name service updates that will make all such mixed configurations work right. No matter how hard Host Manager tried, some combinations would never work. Non-support of different kinds of name service clients on the same network shows up throughout Solaris; it's not just a restriction imposed by the admintool tools. Q) How do the admintool tools support NIS? A) All NIS maps can be read by all admintool tools. No NIS map can be programmatically updated by any admintool tool. Users of any admintool tool on a network using NIS must perform a manual procedure. That procedure involves pretending to use None name service, capturing the changes in /etc files, manually merging the changes into the NIS master files and remaking the NIS maps, and cleaning up the /etc files. The new information will not be known across the entire NIS domain until all the push operations initiated during the manual procedure have completed. Note that neither this use of the None name service option as part of the manual workaround procedure, nor the on-screen documentation of this manual procedure by some admintool tools, change the fact that admintool tools do not expect different Solaris hosts on the same network to use different name service(s). Q) The message Host Manager gives when I select NIS and try to do an operation that might involve updating maps seems to imply the lack of support for NIS updates has something to do with mixed OS versions, and might change in the future. Is this true? A) No. Programmatic updates to NIS are not possible with any combination of OS versions. And so no admintool tools will update NIS under any circumstances. The message Host Manager gives intends only to state that the tool can't update NIS programmatically then tell the user how to do so manually. Unfortunately the message can be interpreted more broadly than it was intended, and may mislead some users. Q) Why can't the admintool tools update NIS automatically? A) The NIS protocol doesn't support updates by programs. In SunOS 4.x the only way to update NIS was to edit the files on the NIS master then run `ypmake`. Solaris isn't any different. In fact, Solaris doesn't support `ypserv` at all. Customers are encouraged to migrate from NIS to NIS+. NIS+ provides much better security, better performance, and can be updated by programs. NIS+ supports a "NIS compatibility mode" to ease the transition. Q) What does it mean to say a printer is a NIS+ Printer? A) Printer Manager maintains a list of "registered" printers across a whole network as a convenience to system administrators. Typically system administrators will register each locally attached printer in the list as they set it up, then refer to that list later when setting up remote access to printers for a client. The list of registered printers happens to be stored by NIS+, and the label "NIS+" fits on the button better than the label "registered". That's the only reason these printers may be called NIS+ Printers. The "lp" subsystem knows nothing about the list of registered printers. Registered printers don't function any differently than unregistered printers. _____________________________________________________________ IP interface Frequently asked Questions/Answers on Solaris 2.x, in the area of networks Q) Is there documentation that describes the interface between IP and network drivers, namely, the SUN specific requirements not outlined in the DLPI Version 2 specification? A) IP is a STREAMS module in Solaris 2.X. Any module or driver interface with IP should follow the STREAMS mechanism.There are no specific requirements for the interface between IP and network drivers. Q) When an ifconfig device0 plumb is issued, the driver immediately receives a DL_INFO_REQ. Exactly what is required in the DL_INFO_ACK from a Style 2 provider? A) Please look at 'dl_info_ack_t' struct in /usr/include/sys/dlpi.h. Q) Is it possible for the driver to be a CLONE driver and also a DLPI Style 2 provider? Yes. Q) If so, how do I map the minor number selected in the open routine to an instance prior to a DL_ATTACH_REQ? The technique of using the minor number to obtain the instance in the getinfo routine is not valid prior to the DL_ATTACH_REQ. How do you suggest this be handled? A) The 'DL_ATTACH_REQ' request is to assign a physical point of attachment(PPA) to a stream. The 'DL_ATTACH_REQ' request can be issued any time after a file or stream being opened. I don't think the 'DL_ATTACH_REQ' request has anything to do with assigning, retrieving or mapping minor/instance number. Of course, you can issue a 'DL_ATTACH_REQ' request for a file or stream with desired major/minor number. To the question of mapping minor number to instance, usually the minor number(getminor(dev) is the instance number. Q) In the examples a minor node is created each time the driver's attach routine is called. How would a CLONE driver attach to multiple boards, that is, have multiple instances, and still only create one minor node? A) For the CLONE driver, I don't know if it is possible to do that. For the non-CLONE driver, it is possible to use the bits information in a particular minor number, for example 'FF', to map all other minor nodes. Q) Does Solaris 2.1 TCP/IP support Streams??? A) Yes, The TCP and IP are STREAMS modules in Solaris 2.1. The command 'strconf < /dev/tcp' will show you the modules. Q) Does SunOS 4.x TCP/IP support Streams?? No. Q) Does Solaris 2.1 ethernet drivers support LLI 2.0 interfaces??? A) Do you mean 'DLPI'(Data Link Provider interfaces) ? The Solaris 2.1 ethernet drivers, le and ie. both support DLPI. Please see man pages of le and ie. Q) Does Solaris 2.1 DLPI provide both connection oriented services and connection less services. Also, is your DLPI Version 2.0, which includes multicast facilities. A) Yes and yes. Please see man page of 'dlpi'. Q) Is multicasting supported on SunOS 4.x? If not, how can the customer obtain this feature? A) IP multicast is a standard supported feature in Solaris 2.x, but we don't support it in SunOS 4.x. If the customer wants to run an unsupported IP multicast on his/her SunOS 4.x machines, it can be got from public domain object distribution that Steve Deering, the inventor of IP multicast, distributes. This is available via anonymous FTP from gregorio.stanford.edu in the file vmtp-ip/ipmulti- sunos41x.tar.Z. _____________________________________________________________ Questions on RPC and TLI Frequently asked Questions/Answers on Solaris 2.x, in the area of networks Q) We are using the TLI functions such as t_open and t_bind in one of our programs. When we do a t_bind call, why do we get an M_DATA ioctl rather than an M_PROTO? Do you intend to do this permanently? A) The t_bind() function does local management, so M_DATA ioctl is an appropriate message block. Q) I'm looking for RPC development kit for Macintosh. Can you help? A) You probably could get those informations by calling 'Apple'. Q) Does Solaris 2.1 support XTI or TLI interfaces? A) Solaris 2.1 support TLI and will support XTI in the near future. Please see "Solaris 2.1 Standards Conformance Guide". You can do a search of 'TLI' on AnswerBook. Q) Does SunOS 4.1 support XTI or TLI interfaces? A) It supports TLI interfaces. Please see man pages of 't_open', 't_bind', 't_snd', 't_close' ... etc. _____________________________________________________________ NFS interoperation Frequently asked Questions/Answers on Solaris 2.x, in the area of networks Q) With Solaris 2.x configured as a client, nfs mount with with HP-UX or AIX machines will not work, even though dfshares shows that the file systems are exported.The error message "Server not responding" appears. A) The following workaround is suggested (to be done on solaris 2.x machine): 1. Append the following two lines into /etc/system set nfs:nfs_portmon=0 set nfs:nfs_fastpath=0 2. Cut the number of group that root belongs to 6 in the /etc/group if this is the case. Usually it happens if root belongs to 11 groups or more.